Skip to main content
Back to Software Dev

Scholarship Selection Decision Support System

Date

Mar 2026

Category

software dev

Scholarship Selection Decision Support System

Project Overview

Features

  1. Multi-Criteria Candidate Evaluation — Score each applicant across key criteria including GPA, monthly family income, number of dependents, academic achievements, and active semester.
  2. Automated SAW Ranking Engine — Instantly computes normalized scores and weighted rankings for all verified candidates in a selection period, no spreadsheets needed.
  3. Selection Period Management — Organize scholarship cycles by academic year with clear start and end dates; only one period can be active at a time to prevent data overlap.
  4. Flexible Criteria & Weight Configuration — Define benefit or cost criteria with custom weights; the system enforces a total weight budget of 100% to ensure a valid calculation.
  5. Candidate Management & Document Upload — Register applicants with full profile data and attach supporting documents (transcripts, income letters, etc.) for each candidate.
  6. Score Input Interface — Enter evaluation scores per candidate per criterion through a clean, guided form with real-time validation.
  7. Review & Validation Workflow — Reviewers can approve, flag, or add notes to individual ranking results before the final decision is published.
  8. Transparent Calculation Breakdown — Every ranked result shows the full normalization and weighted-score breakdown per criterion, making every decision auditable.
  9. Export to PDF & Excel — Download the ranked results for any selection period in a print-ready PDF or a structured Excel file.
  10. Real-Time Dashboard — At-a-glance overview of the active period, total candidates, criteria count, and top 5 ranked applicants.
  11. Activity Audit Log — Full trail of every critical action (calculation runs, reviews, data changes) with timestamps and the responsible user.
  12. Role-Based Access Control — Separate access levels for Admins (full control) and Reviewers (read + review only).

Project Gallery

Gallery image 1
Gallery image 2
Gallery image 3
Gallery image 4
Gallery image 5
Gallery image 6
Gallery image 7
Gallery image 8
Gallery image 9
Gallery image 10

Core Tags

SAW Method Decision Support System Scholarship Multi-Criteria Evaluation Academic Tool Ranking System Audit Trail Role-Based Access

Tech Stack

  • Laravel
  • Livewire
  • Mysql
  • PHP 8

Project Stats

Candidate Capacity

300+

valuation Criteria

5

User Roles

2

Interactive Case Study

Problem → Process → Result

Problem

Scholarship selection at many institutions is done manually using spreadsheets or even paper-based scoring. This leads to inconsistent weighting across reviewers, lack of transparency in how final recipients are chosen, high time cost for the committee, and difficulty auditing past decisions. Applicants and stakeholders have no visibility into why someone was selected or rejected.

Process

The process begins with the admin defining the selection period and configuring the evaluation criteria along with their respective weights and types. Next, applicant data and supporting documents are entered into the system. The admin then inputs the scores for each criterion for every candidate. The system automatically performs the calculation and generates a ranked list. The results are reviewed by reviewers, who can add notes and approve or flag entries as needed. Finally, the finalized results are exported as a PDF or Excel file for distribution.

Result

A fully ranked, transparent, and auditable shortlist of scholarship recipients — generated in seconds instead of days. Every score, weight, and calculation step is recorded and viewable. The review layer ensures human judgment is still part of the process, while the system removes manual bias from the math. Historical data from all past periods is preserved and never permanently lost due to soft-delete safeguards.

Case Study Metrics

Ranking Generation Time

<2s

Calculation Automation

100%

Score Breakdown Visibility

100%

Criteria Weight Accuracy

100%